During various conversations at the dmexco 2012 in cologne I realized that Social Media Risk Management already hit the boardroom but almost nobody is aware of it. So was I!
The reason why I believe that social media already reached the boardroom is so simple and so complex at the same time.
Almost everybody knows that you need to be active on social media. As social networks and social media is constantly gaining more and more power it is the ultimate source to solve a couple of challenges companies and their C-Levels experience:
Who wants to spend millions for marketing campaigns some really enthusiastic and creative brains build without giving you the tools to find out how effective your campaign is.
War for Talents
New employees are the lifeblood of every professional services firm. Attracting the right people and retaining them is key. But how do you do that? Go social! Young people leaving university and school have an incredibly huge social media competence and define themselves different than people like I did at their age. During interviews with potential candidates for our firm I had to realize that the questions I am asked are different than 10 years ago. People ask for BYOD, Smartphones, Work Life Balance Concepts, Mobility Concepts and much more. Most of the time they already used social media to inform themselves about my company. They even do not use our website, but they use facebook and twitter. So going social is not optional! It’s mandatory and therefore it’s a boardroom issue. The C-Suite usually approves this “HR stuff”.
Is customer relationship management an application to plugin to you ERP system or buy a monumental application that stores all your client data. I believe we will see distributed CRM systems in the future. These are the Facebook profiles, twitter lists and Xing / linked in groups which are the data marts for future CRM systems. Right now most of the professional people, being active on social networks, maintain not only private but also business contact lists and support sales and delivery through these channels. It became more viral than most of the non social networking C-Levels believe. In the end it means that you need to rely on those people acting in social networks and facilitate sales and generate leeds. In most of the companies (especially the professional services firms) this is done unintentionally and the leaderships are overwhelmed by the “new” opportunities that arise.
What is the conclusion
You might ask yourself or me why a blogger about security and risk management writes something about CRM and war for talents and what this has to do with Social Media Risk Management.
As I already said it is simple but also complex. Everybody accepts that social media is in important factor in people’s life and business matters. We design campaigns for our businesses. We sometime try to enforce social media policies. But do we really think that there is a difference between private and professional social media? We think so but it’s not! People have to disclose which company they are working for or they should not write one word about this company and stay private.
When asking people about their profiles on social network sites like facebook I very often get the answer:
Uuuh good question, but I am prepared for this! I arranged this in a propper way: facebook is used privately and linkedin is used in the professional part of my life!
Sounds reasonable but reality looks different. If you look at those facebook profiles you see that people disclose their company name and their position in the firm. This is the moment when a private account is not private any more. In Germany there was a law suite about where the judges came up and said that the use of a company name and maybe writing that you want to get (business contacts) is sufficient to assume you are not a privateer and that you have to behave professional.
Following this argumentation the C-Levels need to be in control over what their employees do just in case a third party cannot find out ad hoc if a person is a private or a professional person when looking at posts or their profiles.
C-Levels need to have an overview, who is acting as an employee of their company (even when knowing it). And last but not least it means that C-Levels have to enforce and monitor the use of policies in these open spaces. Right now I believe that boardroom members do not realize that they have to extend their control to social media or tell their people that they may not act on behalf of the firm and have to stay strictly private.
But who wants this? Nobody! You would loose the viral effect of social networks!
I know that this is a provocating statement but I absolutely believe what I wrote. Any comments are highly appreciated.
I’m completely agree, in my country social networks are being highly promoted to be used to generate customer contacts, but only they promotes Linked In and Tweeter, but they never took in consideration the match between the level of information that is revealed for instance in facebook, or other social media. Because as a business level in tweeter and in linked in you could have an appropriate profile for business but maybe your facebook’s profile is not the most suitable profile, and this can affect your company in many forms. Very interesting tweet..Thanks.
Thanks Patricio – you are absolutely right and this is where it comes to confusion if a person may reveal all information and I know companies that do not want their employees to disclose who their employer is. Good point!
Pingback: Thinking about Networking | Standout Limited